Inspection bodies
We support inspection and certification bodies in deciding, on the day they go out, which sample is worth sending to a laboratory.
How many of the samples you collect really need a laboratory?
Sending every sample for full analysis strains both the budget and the calendar. Being able to screen in the field eases them both.
- Most samples coming back from the field return the expected result
- The laboratory queue delays the completion of the inspection report
- Returning to a doubtful sample means another site visit
- The scope of an inspection is limited by the cost per sample
What we provide to inspection bodies
A screening step that lets you make the field decision on the spot.
Screening on site
You read during the visit and determine there which sample goes on for further analysis.
Wider coverage
You can look at more points on the same budget; scope is not narrowed by the cost per sample.
A field record for the file
Every reading made on a visit is kept with its place and time, and stands as an annex to the report.
What matters in inspection
Three priorities in the field.
Time pressure
When the inspection calendar depends on a laboratory queue, the report slips.
Breadth of scope
As the cost per sample rises, the number of points examined falls.
Record integrity
Tying a note taken in the field back to the report afterwards becomes a job of its own.
Let's discuss a screening step that fits your fieldwork.
We will start from how often you visit and how wide your scope runs.